On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:42:37AM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2016, at 9:13 AM, David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> +pointer constants, so other constants such as <code>false</code> and
> >> +<code>(1 - 1)</code> cannot be used where a null pointer is desired.
>
> So, I’d leave this out entirely. The subject is porting, not the fine detail
> pedanticism only a language lawyer could love. Was this text from a porting
> experience, or an invention based upon compiler/language mods?
I believe trying to use false as pointer is from porting experience,
(1 - 1) most likely not really used in the wild, but just clarifies what is
and what is not the null pointer constant.
Jakub
