Hi,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65546 discusses the failure
of gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c. The test fails
differently on GCC 4.9 and 5 than it does on GCC 6. For GCC 6, the test
case is faulty, as we only expect to see the "vectorization not
profitable" statement when misaligned loads/stores are not efficient on
the target hardware. This patch fixes the test for GCC 6.
Something else is going on in the earlier releases, which I plan to look
at separately.
Verified on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu. Is this okay for trunk?
Thanks,
Bill
2016-01-28 Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
PR target/65546
* gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c: Disable check
for "vectorization not profitable" when the target supports
misaligned loads and stores.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c
(revision 232890)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c
(working copy)
@@ -46,5 +46,5 @@ int main (void)
return main1 ();
}
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorization not profitable" 1 "vect" }
} */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorization not profitable" 1 "vect" {
target { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 0 "vect" { target {
! vect_hw_misalign } } } } */
