Dear Peter,
Many thanks! I have been away, got back last night and had intended to
deal with it tonight. You should note that Dominique has flagged up
that it fails with -m32.
Tshuess
Paul
On 25 January 2016 at 18:09, Peter Bergner <berg...@vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> When the test case derived_constructor_comps_6.f90 was backported to
> the FSF 5 branch, a '}' on the dg-additional-options was dropped
> causing the test case to fail. I have added it back and committed
> it as obvious.
>
> Peter
>
> PR fortran/61831
> * gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_comps_6.f90: Add missing } to fix
> up dg-additional-options.
>
>
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_comps_6.f90
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_comps_6.f90 (revision
> 232798)
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/derived_constructor_comps_6.f90 (working copy)
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> ! { dg-do run }
> -! { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-original"
> +! { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-original" }
> !
> ! PR fortran/61831
> ! The deallocation of components of array constructor elements
>
--
The difference between genius and stupidity is; genius has its limits.
Albert Einstein
