Torvald, Now that I can bootstrap on darwin, I have found the following failure for libitm.c++/libstdc++-safeexc.C
/opt/gcc/work/libitm/testsuite/libitm.c++/libstdc++-safeexc.C:50:2: error: unsafe function call 'std::underflow_error::underflow_error(const string&)' within atomic transaction throw T (what); ^~~~~ /opt/gcc/work/libitm/testsuite/libitm.c++/libstdc++-safeexc.C:50:2: error: unsafe function call 'std::overflow_error::overflow_error(const string&)' within atomic transaction throw T (what); ^~~~~ /opt/gcc/work/libitm/testsuite/libitm.c++/libstdc++-safeexc.C:50:2: error: unsafe function call 'std::range_error::range_error(const string&)' within atomic transaction throw T (what); ^~~~~ /opt/gcc/work/libitm/testsuite/libitm.c++/libstdc++-safeexc.C:50:2: error: unsafe function call 'std::runtime_error::runtime_error(const string&)' within atomic transaction throw T (what); ^~~~~ /opt/gcc/work/libitm/testsuite/libitm.c++/libstdc++-safeexc.C:50:2: error: unsafe function call 'std::out_of_range::out_of_range(const string&)' within atomic transaction throw T (what); ^~~~~ /opt/gcc/work/libitm/testsuite/libitm.c++/libstdc++-safeexc.C:50:2: error: unsafe function call 'std::length_error::length_error(const string&)' within atomic transaction throw T (what); ^~~~~ /opt/gcc/work/libitm/testsuite/libitm.c++/libstdc++-safeexc.C:50:2: error: unsafe function call 'std::invalid_argument::invalid_argument(const string&)' within atomic transaction throw T (what); ^~~~~ /opt/gcc/work/libitm/testsuite/libitm.c++/libstdc++-safeexc.C:50:2: error: unsafe function call 'std::domain_error::domain_error(const string&)' within atomic transaction throw T (what); ^~~~~ /opt/gcc/work/libitm/testsuite/libitm.c++/libstdc++-safeexc.C:50:2: error: unsafe function call 'std::logic_error::logic_error(const string&)' within atomic transaction throw T (what); ^~~~~ TIA Dominique > Le 19 janv. 2016 à 20:20, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> a écrit : > > On 19/01/16 20:10 +0100, Torvald Riegel wrote: >> On Sat, 2016-01-16 at 10:57 +0100, Dominique d'Humières wrote: >>> > Addressed these, fixed a problem with using GLIBCXX_WEAK_DEFINITION >>> > (which is only set on Darwin despite the generic-sounding name -- so >>> > just use __attribute__((weak)) directly), and also updated >>> > testsuite_abi.cc so that it knows about CXXABI_1.3.10. >>> > >>> > Approved by Jonathan Wakely. Committed as r232454. >>> This breaks bootstrap on darwin, see >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69310. >> >> Please give this patch a try. I've only tested it on x86_64-linux. >> Jon, okay from your side if Darwin testing succeeds? > > Yes, OK.
