On 21/01/16 09:20, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!

This is the same issue that has been fixed a while ago in the aarch64 port
as PR65624.  Bootstrapped/regtested on armv7hl-linux-gnueabi, ok for trunk?

Ok, thanks for taking care of this.
Kyrill

2016-01-21   Stefan Sørensen  <stefan.soren...@spectralink.com>
             Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR target/69187
        PR target/65624
        * config/arm/arm-builtins.c (arm_expand_neon_builtin): Increase
        args array size by one to avoid buffer overflow.

        * gcc.target/arm/pr69187.c: New test.

--- gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c.jj    2016-01-15 20:37:31.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c       2016-01-20 09:04:40.121275057 +0100
@@ -2246,7 +2246,7 @@ arm_expand_neon_builtin (int fcode, tree
    neon_builtin_datum *d =
                &neon_builtin_data[fcode - ARM_BUILTIN_NEON_PATTERN_START];
    enum insn_code icode = d->code;
-  builtin_arg args[SIMD_MAX_BUILTIN_ARGS];
+  builtin_arg args[SIMD_MAX_BUILTIN_ARGS + 1];
    int num_args = insn_data[d->code].n_operands;
    int is_void = 0;
    int k;
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr69187.c.jj   2016-01-20 09:02:53.832778539 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr69187.c      2016-01-20 09:03:26.132321652 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* PR target/69187 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon } */
+/* { dg-options "-O0" }  */
+/* { dg-add-options arm_neon }  */
+
+#include <arm_neon.h>
+
+int32x4_t
+foo (void)
+{
+  int32x4_t vector_int32x4;
+  int16x4_t vector3_int16x4;
+  int16x4_t vector4_int16x4;
+  static int32_t buffer_int32x4[32];
+
+  vector_int32x4 = vld1q_s32(buffer_int32x4);
+  return vqdmlsl_lane_s16(vector_int32x4, vector3_int16x4, vector4_int16x4, 0);
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to