On 21/01/16 09:20, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
This is the same issue that has been fixed a while ago in the aarch64 port
as PR65624. Bootstrapped/regtested on armv7hl-linux-gnueabi, ok for trunk?
Ok, thanks for taking care of this.
Kyrill
2016-01-21 Stefan Sørensen <stefan.soren...@spectralink.com>
Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR target/69187
PR target/65624
* config/arm/arm-builtins.c (arm_expand_neon_builtin): Increase
args array size by one to avoid buffer overflow.
* gcc.target/arm/pr69187.c: New test.
--- gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c.jj 2016-01-15 20:37:31.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c 2016-01-20 09:04:40.121275057 +0100
@@ -2246,7 +2246,7 @@ arm_expand_neon_builtin (int fcode, tree
neon_builtin_datum *d =
&neon_builtin_data[fcode - ARM_BUILTIN_NEON_PATTERN_START];
enum insn_code icode = d->code;
- builtin_arg args[SIMD_MAX_BUILTIN_ARGS];
+ builtin_arg args[SIMD_MAX_BUILTIN_ARGS + 1];
int num_args = insn_data[d->code].n_operands;
int is_void = 0;
int k;
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr69187.c.jj 2016-01-20 09:02:53.832778539
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr69187.c 2016-01-20 09:03:26.132321652
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* PR target/69187 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_neon } */
+/* { dg-options "-O0" } */
+/* { dg-add-options arm_neon } */
+
+#include <arm_neon.h>
+
+int32x4_t
+foo (void)
+{
+ int32x4_t vector_int32x4;
+ int16x4_t vector3_int16x4;
+ int16x4_t vector4_int16x4;
+ static int32_t buffer_int32x4[32];
+
+ vector_int32x4 = vld1q_s32(buffer_int32x4);
+ return vqdmlsl_lane_s16(vector_int32x4, vector3_int16x4, vector4_int16x4, 0);
+}
Jakub