On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:28:40PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> The attached patch fixes a test failure caused by expecting the
> error message for the wrong line.

Can this be committed?

> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 
>       * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-reinterpret1.C: Fix line number that is
>       expected to generate an error.

> >From 7405de336d2e22e68d39fdfc2c1520ea0c3cc91a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Dominik Vogt <v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:26:56 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix line number that is expected to generate an error.
> 
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-reinterpret1.C | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-reinterpret1.C 
> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-reinterpret1.C
> index a5e3c1f1..0ea42a0 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-reinterpret1.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-reinterpret1.C
> @@ -15,10 +15,8 @@ public:
>    };
>  
>    constexpr static Inner & getInner()
> -  {
> -    /* I am surprised this is considered a constexpr */
> -    return *((Inner *)4);
> -  } // { dg-error "reinterpret_cast" "" }
> +  /* I am surprised this is considered a constexpr */
> +  { return *((Inner *)4); } // { dg-error "reinterpret_cast" "" }
>  };
>  
>  B B::instance;

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

-- 

Dominik Vogt
IBM Germany

Reply via email to