On Sun, 2016-01-17 at 17:03 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 17 January 2016 at 17:01, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On 16 January 2016 at 22:47, Torvald Riegel wrote: > >> This adds a missing string argument to a call to static_assert, thus not > >> making it depend on c++1z extensions. This fixes the build breakage on > >> mingw introduced in 232454. > >> > >> Tested on x86_64-linux. OK? > > > > OK. > > Actually please change the message, so it states the condition being > tested, not the negation. > > e.g. "Pointers are 32 bits or 64 bits wide" > > or state what must be true, "Pointers must be 32 bits or 64 bits wide"
I committed the latter.
