On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:30:20PM +0000, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> > 2015-04-08 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
> >
> > PR target/65689
> > * genpreds.c (struct constraint_data): Add maybe_allows_reg and
> > maybe_allows_mem bitfields.
> > (maybe_allows_none_start, maybe_allows_none_end,
> > maybe_allows_reg_start, maybe_allows_reg_end, maybe_allows_mem_start,
> > maybe_allows_mem_end): New variables.
> > (compute_maybe_allows): New function.
> > (add_constraint): Use it to initialize maybe_allows_reg and
> > maybe_allows_mem fields.
> > (choose_enum_order): Sort the non-is_register/is_const_int/is_memory/
> > is_address constraints such that those that allow neither mem nor
> > reg come first, then those that only allow reg but not mem, then
> > those that only allow mem but not reg, then the rest.
> > (write_allows_reg_mem_function): New function.
> > (write_tm_preds_h): Call it.
> > * stmt.c (parse_output_constraint, parse_input_constraint): Use
> > the generated insn_extra_constraint_allows_reg_mem function
> > instead of always setting *allows_reg = true; *allows_mem = true;
> > for unknown extra constraints.
>
> Hi Jakub,
>
> This applies clean to gcc-5-branch. I've bootstrapped and tested it on
> x86_64-none-linux-gnu, aarch64-none-linux-gnu and arm-none-linux-gnueabihf
> with no problems.
>
> Is this OK to commit to gcc-5-branch so I can close out PR 65689?
Ok, thanks.
Jakub
