On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote: > With the last two fixes, the only remaining i686 regression > from Thursday is 1 fortran testcase, whose number I have > misplaced. This highlights an accidental change I made while > moving code around between functions, and an assertion I > added trying to see if we'd Done The Right Thing already. > > The entire treatment of args_size is Very Confusing. > I suspect it ought to be all re-written, but I'll save that > for later once the dust has settled. > > > r~ > > > > PR debug/49825 > * dwarf2cfi.c (dwarf2out_stack_adjust): Move A_O_A test earlier. > (dwarf2out_notice_stack_adjust): Use args_size from call_insn. >
Not all regressions are fixed. The last one has a new PR: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49972 -- H.J.
