Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 08/09/2011 09:14 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>> I don't think we should define the C++ 2011 value yet. In my opinion, we
>> should wait until:
>> 1) the standard is official
>> 2) gcc implements most of it: people will want to use __cplusplus as a
>> test to know if they can use C++0X features, not if the compiler does
>> some effort to implement half of them.
>
> I'm of two minds about this, but I see that clang and edg still use 199711L
> in C++0x mode, so let's stick with that for now.
Ok, I just wanted to bring it up. I'll resubmit with the 201103L change
removed once the other patches (tm etc. mangling and libstdc++) are
resolved.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
