Hi! We ICE on the following testcase during SRA, because it sees a field with DECL_SIZE of 1 which is not DECL_BIT_FIELD. The problem is that layout_class_type in some cases copies fields, including DECL_SIZE, but does not copy over DECL_BIT_FIELD flag. The following patch copies even that and also DECL_SIZE_UNIT and DEC_BIT_FIELD_TYPE that weren't copied either.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2016-01-07 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR c++/69164 * class.c (layout_class_type): Also copy DEC_SIZE_UNIT, DECL_BIT_FIELD and DEC_BIT_FIELD_TYPE. * g++.dg/opt/pr69164.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/class.c.jj 2016-01-04 14:55:57.000000000 +0100 +++ gcc/cp/class.c 2016-01-07 13:59:13.895677297 +0100 @@ -6493,7 +6493,10 @@ layout_class_type (tree t, tree *virtual DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET (*next_field) = DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET (field); DECL_SIZE (*next_field) = DECL_SIZE (field); + DECL_SIZE_UNIT (*next_field) = DECL_SIZE_UNIT (field); DECL_MODE (*next_field) = DECL_MODE (field); + DECL_BIT_FIELD (*next_field) = DECL_BIT_FIELD (field); + DECL_BIT_FIELD_TYPE (*next_field) = DECL_BIT_FIELD_TYPE (field); next_field = &DECL_CHAIN (*next_field); } --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr69164.C.jj 2016-01-07 13:56:33.013915214 +0100 +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr69164.C 2016-01-07 13:55:57.000000000 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +// PR c++/69164 +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } +// { dg-options "-O2" } + +struct A { + struct B { + B () {} + bool : 1; + }; + B foo () { B r; return r; } +}; + +struct C { + struct D { + D (C *x) : d (x->c.foo ()) {} + A::B d; + }; + A c; +}; + +struct F : C { + D f = this; + F (int, int) {} +}; + +void +bar (int a, int b) +{ + F (b, a); +} Jakub