On Jan 3, 2016, at 9:34 AM, Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On 03.01.2016 17:23, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 03/01/16 15:52, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> No, libgcj versions up to 4.9.3 didn't change the value for releases taken >>> from >>> the same branch. All of 4.9.0, 4.9.1, 4.9.2, 4.9.3 have the same >>> GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSION. But 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 have *different* >>> GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSIONs. >>> >>>>> Why change this rule now, at this stage of GCJ's life? >>> This was changed by the change of the version schema, an unintential change >>> for >>> GCJ_CXX_ABI_VERSION. I want to keep it that way, not change it with every >>> release from the gcc-5 branch. >> >> Because effectively we've done an arithmetic shift left on the GCC version >> numbering, I guess? So where we would have had 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.1.3, we now >> have 5.1, 5.2, 5.3? > > yes, exactly.
But, isn’t there a trunk version of this patch? I mean, the same issue applies to it and gcc 6, gcc 7 and gcc 8, no?
