On 12/11/2015 03:59 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,

This patch adds a parameter to TERMINATE_PASS_LIST, that should match
the pass list it's supposed to terminate.

The intention of the patch is that it:
- makes it easier to understand the top-level hierarchy of the pass
   list (given that the top-level list may be quite long).
- ensures that INSERT_PASSES_AFTER and TERMINATE_PASS_LIST are paired.

OK for stage3/stage1 trunk, if bootstrap and reg-test succeeds?
I'd prefer to wait for stage1 on this. It feels like we've got way too much macro-magic going on in here. I guess as long as we have the macro-magic in here, verification like this is OK.


Jeff

Reply via email to