On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:39:50PM +0000, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> On 09/12/15 15:38, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >This adds a testcase for the already fixed PR68348.
> >
> >Tested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
> >
> >2015-12-09 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
> >
> > PR c++/68348
> > * g++.dg/cpp0x/pr68348.C: New test.
> >
> >diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr68348.C
> >gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr68348.C
> >index e69de29..9033bba 100644
> >--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr68348.C
> >+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr68348.C
> >@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> >+// PR c++/68348
> >+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> >+
> >+struct C {
> >+ constexpr C() : w(), x(), y() {}
> >+ constexpr double fn() const noexcept;
> >+ double w;
> >+ double x;
> >+ double y;
> >+};
> >+
> >+constexpr double C::fn() const noexcept { return w; }
> >+C foo()
> >+{
> >+ C c;
> >+ c.fn ();
> >+ return c;
> >+}
> >
> > Marek
> >
>
> Same as:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01001.html
> :)
Ah! The PR wasn't assigned to anyone. But I think my version is better
because I think we prefer
// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
to
/* { dg-options "-std=c++11 -O2" } */
;)
Marek
