>> Alright then. How about this: I'll commit the attached verision of the >> patch (including your suggestions), and we start messing with the >> return values afterwards? Patch is regtested on >> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. I hope the test case is sufficient for a >> start. > > This is OK. Thanks for the patch (and for bearing with me ;-)
Well, thanks for the thorough discussion :) Committed as r177550. > When extending the values of gfc_dep_compare_expr, we will need to go > through all its uses (making sure we change == -2 to <= -2). Right. I will try to take care of that during the coming week (unless you beat me to it). Cheers, Janus
