On 12/02/2015 03:23 PM, Jan Sommer wrote:
Am Wednesday 02 December 2015, 08:13:20 schrieb Joel Sherrill:
On December 2, 2015 2:14:22 AM EST, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com>
wrote:
On 12/01/2015 12:56 PM, Jan Sommer wrote:
Am Monday 30 November 2015, 16:19:30 schrieb Jeff Law:
On 11/30/2015 03:06 PM, Jan Sommer wrote:
Could someone with write access please commit the patch?
The paperwork with the FSF has gone through. If something
else is
missing, please tell me.
I won't be available next week.
I'm not sure what you built your patches again, but I can't
apply
them
to the trunk. Can you resend a patch as a diff against the
trunk.
Often I can fix things by hand, but this is Ada and I'd be
much more likely to botch something.
I updated the patches again. They should now fit with the heads
of
the respective branches again.
Maybe the Changelog will be out of synch again. The patches are
for the following branches: ada-68169_4.9.diff -->
gcc-4_9-branch ada-68169_5.x.diff --> gcc-5-branch
ada-68169_trunk.diff --> trunk
Let me know if they apply this time. I used svn diff to create
them
and used patch -p0 to test if they apply locally. THanks. I've
committed this to the trunk based on Joel's comments.
The gcc-5 branch is frozen for the upcoming release and gcc-4.9
is regression/doc fixes only. It'll be up to the release
managers whether
or not to backport to those branches.
Thanks Jeff.
I would consider this a regression. RTEMS changed the
pthread_attr_t when we added thread affinity and updating Ada to
match slipped through. We knew it needed attention for SMP but
missed this critical piece to keep it working.
OK. I wasn't aware of this. Given this note, I went ahead and
committed the change to the gcc-5 and gcc-4.9 branches. However, it
missed the deadline for 5.3, which went out earlier this morning.
Jeff
