On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> These problems were found by testing ZERO_EXTENDed addresses with x32
> target. The problems were in handling of SUBREGs of parts.base and
> parts.index and in usage of "offsetable operand", 'o' operand
> constraint.
Whops, forgot to commit this part:
2011-08-05 Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>
* config/i386/i386.md (*movdi_internal_rex64): Use "!o" constraint
instead of "!m" for operand 0, alternative 4.
(*movdf_internal_rex64): Ditto for operand 0, alernative 6.
Uros.
