On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:57:54PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:53:40AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Does the following look like the kind of thing you had in mind? (just
> > the tree.def part for now). Presumably usable for both lvalues and
> > rvalues, where the thing it wraps is what's important. It merely exists
> > to add an EXPR_LOCATION, for a usage of the wrapped thing.
>
> Yes, but please see with Jason, Richard and perhaps others if they are ok
> with that too before spending too much time in that direction.
> All occurrences of it would have to be folded away during the gimplification
> at latest, this shouldn't be something we use in the middle-end.
I'd expect LOCATION_EXPR be defined in c-family/c-common.def, not tree.def.
And I'd think it shouldn't survive genericizing, thus never leak into the ME.
Marek
