Hi,
this patchs fixes few issues in ipa-icf. First I drop the use of TYPE_CANONICAL
because that is no longer part of type compatibility machinery.
Second I also hash TYPE_MODE for aggregates, becuase we now always require a
match
and I check that we don't match types that are incomplete where this would give
false negatives.
Second change is in func_checker::compatible_types_p where I disabled comparing
of alias sets of types that do not have alias sets (and thus can never be read).
I hoped to switch ipa-icf-gimple.c to use of operand_equal_p and drop all such
wrong type mathcing, but I suppose it will need to wait for next stage1.
Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, comitted.
Honza
* ipa-icf.c (sem_item::add_type): Do not look for TYPE_CANONICAL;
do not check AGGREGATE_TYPE_P when adding TYPE_MODE;
Check that all record types are complete.
* ipa-icf-gimple.c (func_checker::compatible_types_p): Do not
compare alias sets for types w/o alias sets.
Index: ipa-icf.c
===================================================================
--- ipa-icf.c (revision 230683)
+++ ipa-icf.c (working copy)
@@ -1543,11 +1543,8 @@ sem_item::add_type (const_tree type, inc
}
type = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type);
- if (TYPE_CANONICAL (type))
- type = TYPE_CANONICAL (type);
- if (!AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (type))
- hstate.add_int (TYPE_MODE (type));
+ hstate.add_int (TYPE_MODE (type));
if (TREE_CODE (type) == COMPLEX_TYPE)
{
@@ -1574,6 +1571,7 @@ sem_item::add_type (const_tree type, inc
}
else if (RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P (type))
{
+ gcc_checking_assert (COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type));
hashval_t *val = optimizer->m_type_hash_cache.get (type);
if (!val)
Index: ipa-icf-gimple.c
===================================================================
--- ipa-icf-gimple.c (revision 230683)
+++ ipa-icf-gimple.c (working copy)
@@ -233,7 +233,15 @@ func_checker::compatible_types_p (tree t
if (!types_compatible_p (t1, t2))
return return_false_with_msg ("types are not compatible");
- if (get_alias_set (t1) != get_alias_set (t2))
+ /* We do a lot of unnecesary matching of types that are not being
+ accessed and thus do not need to be compatible. In longer term we should
+ remove these checks on all types which are not accessed as memory
+ locations.
+
+ For time being just avoid calling get_alias_set on types that are not
+ having alias sets defined at all. */
+ if (type_with_alias_set_p (t1) && type_with_alias_set_p (t2)
+ && get_alias_set (t1) != get_alias_set (t2))
return return_false_with_msg ("alias sets are different");
return true;