On 11/17/2015 07:35 PM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
I've updated the comments and documentation, see below. I hope it makes sense now - returning rtx that computes the same value as the tree expression we're emitting is the most useful thing one can do.
The target-independent part is ok. Note that some of the documentation parts were word-wrapped; please check that you've not exceeded the line lengths, and make sure you send future patches in a way that doesn't suffer from that (text/plain attachments for example).
Bernd
