On 15 November 2015 at 10:01, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote: > On 11/14/2015 09:33 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> On 13 November 2015 at 13:17, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote: >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> Following patch fixes PR68311, can regbootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu. >>>> >>>> Ready for trunk? >>> >>> Please use >>> >>> auto_vec <congruence_class *, 2> newclasses; >>> >>> as it gets you a stack allocation. Also use quick_push as you know the >>> vector >>> is large enough. >>> >>> Ok with that changes. >>> >>> Richard. >>> >> Hi, >> >> This patch broke the GCC build for armeb in libgfortran: >> /tmp/9046893_7.tmpdir/aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/gccsrc/libgfortran/generated/matmul_i4.c: >> In function 'matmul_i4': >> /tmp/9046893_7.tmpdir/aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/gccsrc/libgfortran/generated/matmul_i4.c:79:1: >> internal compiler error: in vectorizable_load, at tree-vect-s >> tmts.c:6711 >> matmul_i4 (gfc_array_i4 * const restrict retarray, >> ^ >> >> 0xcff5d2 vectorizable_load >> >> /tmp/9046893_7.tmpdir/aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/gccsrc/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:6711 >> 0xd06955 vect_transform_stmt(gimple*, gimple_stmt_iterator*, bool*, >> _slp_tree*, _slp_instance*) >> >> /tmp/9046893_7.tmpdir/aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/gccsrc/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:8002 >> 0xd0ec21 vect_transform_loop(_loop_vec_info*) >> >> /tmp/9046893_7.tmpdir/aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/gccsrc/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c:6793 >> 0xd317c9 vectorize_loops() >> >> /tmp/9046893_7.tmpdir/aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/gccsrc/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c:533 >> Please submit a full bug report, > > Hi Christophe. > > It looks really strange that the ICE is caused by the patch. May I ask you > for creating a PR > and attaching pre-processed source file, so that I can reproduce it with > cross-compiler? >
Well, the build succeded before this commit and started to fail at r230311 (this commit). I've created https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68367 Thanks > Thank you, > Martin > >> >> >> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Martin >
