On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:17:38AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote: > IMO, this is such a small code-size regression, that it should not > block the patch submission.
In that case: Kyrill, the patch is okay for trunk. Thanks! > It would be nice to know, what causes the > increase (in case, this is some systematic oversight), but we can live > with it. After the patch it will no longer combine an imul reg,reg (+ mov) into an imul mem,reg. _Most_ cases that end up as mem,reg are already expanded as such, but not all. It's hard to make a smallish testcase. Segher
