On 3 November 2015 at 02:37, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/02/2015 09:20 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote: >> >> On 2 November 2015 at 21:20, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Can we follow the terse style already used elsewhere (eg, >>> __is_direct_constructible_new_safe) thus directly inherit from __and_ and >>> avoid explicit integral_constant? Otherwise patch looks good to me. >> >> >> Sure. Tested again on Linux-PPC64, tests adjusted due to line changes, >> Changelog entry updated to have a correct date on it. > > Great, thanks a lot. Thinking more about this detail, I wonder if we should > therefore apply the below too? Anything I'm missing?
I have a weak preference for deriving from xxx::type rather than xxx, so that the traits derive directly from either true_type or false_type, not indirectly via some other type that derives from true_type or false_type, but it probably isn't important.
