On May 28, 2015 2:03:08 PM GMT+02:00, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: >On May 28, 2015, at 2:02 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer ><rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Does anybody have a better suggestion? >> >> directive not at the start of a loop at %C >> directive not followed by a loop at %C > >I prefer either of these. I have a slight preference for the first.
I've changed the Fortran error to the first locally. > >> Mike, did you tweak the one or two things you got from the reviews >> yet? > >Nope. > >> ISTM your main patch was not OKed yet nor installed. > >Been busy with work. I’ll come back and address the nits that people >pointed out and see if I can ping it some more and try and get the C++ >bits reviewed. I take it you're well aware that stage 1 will end in a couple of weeks, and maybe you want to have this in GCC-6, so now would be the perfect time.. :) Cheers,
