On 02/11/15 09:26, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>
> On 02/11/15 09:20, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>>
>> On 02/11/15 08:38, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>>>>> 2015-10-12 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PR target/67929
>>>>>> * gcc.target/arm/pr67929_1.c: New test.
>>>> This test fails when tested on hard-float targets, adding the
>>>> following line to avoid testing it in such cases will fix the issue,
>>>> but I wonder if there is a better dejaGNU directives sequence to do
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> /* { dg-skip-if "avoid conflicting multilib options" { *-*-*eabihf } {
>>>> "*" } { "" } } */
>>> No, not without further investigation into why the test is failing.
>>
>> I believe it's the same issue that Christophe reported
>> in the comment for https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67929.
>> It's because /* { dg-add-options arm_vfp3 } */ added -mfloat-abi=softfp but
>> the crt* files were compiled for hardfp. It's a testism.
>> I think adding an explicit -mfloat-abi=hard and gating on arm_hard_vfp_ok?
>
> No, see my other response.
>
> Looking at it again, I can't see anything ARM specific in the source
> that causes this to remain in gcc.target/arm.
>
> Instead remove all the special casing and move it into gcc.c-torture/execute.
>
Agreed, but foo() should be marked no-inline, no-clone if doing that.
R.
> regards
> Ramana
>
>>
>>> regards
>>> Ramana
>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Yvan
>>>>
>>
