On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Caroline Tice <cmt...@google.com> wrote:
> Here is my promised backport to the GCC 4.9 branch, for the patch below
> that went into ToT last week.  As with the previous patch, I've
> verified that it fixes the problem, bootstraps and has no new
> regression test failures.  Is this ok to commit to the gcc-4_9-branch?

Ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

> -- Caroline Tice
> cmt...@google.com
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>  2015-10-26  Caroline Tice  <cmt...@google.com>
>
>         (from Richard Biener)
>          * tree.c (int_cst_hash_hash):  Replace XORs with more efficient
>          calls to iterative_hash_host_wide_int.

Reply via email to