Hi Kyrill, On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:57:54PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > because combine now successfully tries to match: > (set (reg/i:SI 0 x0) > (fix:SI (mult:SF (reg:SF 32 v0 [ a ]) > (const_double:SF 3.2e+1 [0x0.8p+6])))) > > whereas before it would not try the to use the const_double directly > but rather its constant pool reference.
What happens if the constant pool reference is actually the better code, do we still generate that? Segher
