On 10/16/2015 02:53 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
For x86, STC still gives better results for optimise-for-size than "simple" does. So use STC at -Os as well.
For how many targets is this true, and for the others, what is the biggest win from "simple"? If the list of targets which get patches such as this one is too large, maybe we ought to admit defeat on the "simple" algorithm and revert it.
Bernd
