On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 04:49:41PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote: > Joseph reminded me that I had forgotten about this patch. As mentioned > here <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01792.html>, I'm > removing the XFAILs in the tests so people are likely to see new FAILs. > > I think the following targets will need similar fix as the one below: > * MIPS > * rs6000 > * alpha > * sparc > * s390 > * arm > * sh > * aarch64 > > I'm CCing the respective maintainers. You might want to XFAIL those tests.
I've applied the following patch for s390. Bye, -Andreas- gcc/ChangeLog: 2015-10-08 Andreas Krebbel <kreb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> PR c/65345 * config/s390/s390.c (s390_atomic_assign_expand_fenv): Use create_tmp_var_raw instead of create_tmp_var. diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/s390.c b/gcc/config/s390/s390.c index 5ab6ce7..b994cd2 100644 --- a/gcc/config/s390/s390.c +++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390.c @@ -13678,7 +13678,7 @@ s390_atomic_assign_expand_fenv (tree *hold, tree *clear, tree *update) tree sfpc = s390_builtin_decls[S390_BUILTIN_s390_sfpc]; tree efpc = s390_builtin_decls[S390_BUILTIN_s390_efpc]; tree call_efpc = build_call_expr (efpc, 0); - tree fenv_var = create_tmp_var (unsigned_type_node); + tree fenv_var = create_tmp_var_raw (unsigned_type_node); #define FPC_EXCEPTION_MASK HOST_WIDE_INT_UC (0xf8000000) #define FPC_FLAGS_MASK HOST_WIDE_INT_UC (0x00f80000) @@ -13714,7 +13714,7 @@ s390_atomic_assign_expand_fenv (tree *hold, tree *clear, tree *update) __builtin_s390_sfpc (fenv_var); __atomic_feraiseexcept ((old_fpc & FPC_FLAGS_MASK) >> FPC_FLAGS_SHIFT); */ - old_fpc = create_tmp_var (unsigned_type_node); + old_fpc = create_tmp_var_raw (unsigned_type_node); tree store_old_fpc = build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, void_type_node, old_fpc, call_efpc);