On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:15:17AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > >I guess the support of cc0 can be implemented for reasonable amount of > >time. It is just a priority issue. I still have a lot PRs for the > >targets already using LRA. > I wouldn't suggest making cc0 support a significant priority. I'd be > more likely to push for deprecating cc0 targets first.
It looks like most cc0 targets would be pretty easy to convert, if anyone can do testing anyway ;-) Segher
