On 11 September 2015 at 23:05, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hmm, I think we really ought to accept > > new auto { 2 } > > to be consistent with all the other recent changes to treat { elt } like > (elt); this seems like a piece that was missed from DR 1467. Do you agree, > Ville?
Yes. I thought we already accept it.