On 11 September 2015 at 23:05, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hmm, I think we really ought to accept
>
>   new auto { 2 }
>
> to be consistent with all the other recent changes to treat { elt } like
> (elt); this seems like a piece that was missed from DR 1467.  Do you agree,
> Ville?


Yes. I thought we already accept it.

Reply via email to