Hi! The gimplifier does not like if error_mark_node is forcefully wrapped into a NOP_EXPR.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk and 5 branch. 2015-09-10 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR c++/67511 * semantics.c (handle_omp_for_class_iterator): Don't wrap error_mark_node into a NOP_EXPR to void_type_node. * g++.dg/gomp/pr67511.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/semantics.c.jj 2015-08-24 18:27:13.000000000 +0200 +++ gcc/cp/semantics.c 2015-09-09 11:51:31.576714709 +0200 @@ -6453,7 +6453,8 @@ handle_omp_for_class_iterator (int i, lo iter_init = build_x_modify_expr (elocus, iter, PLUS_EXPR, iter_init, tf_warning_or_error); - iter_init = build1 (NOP_EXPR, void_type_node, iter_init); + if (iter_init != error_mark_node) + iter_init = build1 (NOP_EXPR, void_type_node, iter_init); finish_expr_stmt (iter_init); finish_expr_stmt (build_x_modify_expr (elocus, last, NOP_EXPR, decl, --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/pr67511.C.jj 2015-09-09 12:04:19.830354901 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/pr67511.C 2015-09-09 12:03:55.000000000 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +// PR c++/67511 +// { dg-do compile } +// { dg-options "-fopenmp" } + +struct I +{ + I (); + I (const I &); + I &operator++ (); + bool operator< (const I &) const; +}; +__PTRDIFF_TYPE__ operator- (const I &, const I &); + +void +foo (I &x, I &y) +{ +#pragma omp for + for (I i = x; i < y; ++i) // { dg-error "no match for" } + ; +} Jakub