On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 13:16 +0200, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 07:35:17PM +0200, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 14:36 +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2015-05-06 at 17:54 +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
> > > > > 2015-05-06  Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy  <gle...@altlinux.org>
> > > > > 
> > > > >       PR libitm/61164
> > > > >       * local_atomic (__always_inline): Rename to...
> > > > >       (__libitm_always_inline): ... this.
> > > > 
> > > > OK.  Thanks.
> > > 
> > > You are welcome.
> > > 
> > > It seems still not applied, AFAICS.
> > 
> > I forgot to ask you at Cauldron whether you have completed a copyright
> > assignment agreement?
> 
> No, I didn't. I'm in progress.
> 
> >  I don't think this is small enough to be a
> > trivial patch.
> 
> "A regular series of repeated changes, such as renaming a symbol, is not
> legally significant even if the symbol has to be renamed in many places."
> https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Legally-Significant.html#Legally-Significant

OK.  I committed this to trunk for you, with the "(tiny change)" marker
in the ChangeLog as suggested on this GNU web page.



Reply via email to