On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 02:40:56PM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote: > > If so many targets use default_assemble_label, can you make it an actual > > default instead of defining it everywhere? > > Well, it is the default, but many targets do over ride it to set it to > the default ;)
Right, noticed that too late :-) > Its certainly possible to remove some of those cases, > but that seems like the sort of thing one might want to test more than > just making sure gcc/ builds, and I'm not really set up to do that. Is > there a problem with leaving this for target maintainers to do? It > seems like an improvement over what we have, and I don't think they are > getting in anyones way. If you're not confident removing it yourself, then don't. It isn't getting in anyone's way, simply because there is so *much* clutter... Segher
