This sprinkles some more unshare_exprs here and there in the ubsan code.
Maybe we'll have to add some more of them elsewhere, too.

Unfortunately this doesn't fix the ARM -Wmaybe-uninitialized issue yet :(.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?

2015-07-23  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>

        * c-ubsan.c (ubsan_instrument_division): Use unshare_expr throughout.
        (ubsan_instrument_shift): Likewise.

diff --git gcc/c-family/c-ubsan.c gcc/c-family/c-ubsan.c
index 3869511..e0cce84 100644
--- gcc/c-family/c-ubsan.c
+++ gcc/c-family/c-ubsan.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ ubsan_instrument_division (location_t loc, tree op0, tree op1)
       && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (type))
     {
       tree x;
-      tt = fold_build2 (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node, op1,
+      tt = fold_build2 (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node, unshare_expr (op1),
                        build_int_cst (type, -1));
       x = fold_build2 (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node, op0,
                       TYPE_MIN_VALUE (type));
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ ubsan_instrument_division (location_t loc, tree op0, tree 
op1)
          TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (op0) = 1;
        }
     }
-  t = fold_build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (t), op0, t);
+  t = fold_build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (t), unshare_expr (op0), t);
   if (flag_sanitize_undefined_trap_on_error)
     tt = build_call_expr_loc (loc, builtin_decl_explicit (BUILT_IN_TRAP), 0);
   else
@@ -117,6 +117,8 @@ ubsan_instrument_division (location_t loc, tree op0, tree 
op1)
          ? BUILT_IN_UBSAN_HANDLE_DIVREM_OVERFLOW
          : BUILT_IN_UBSAN_HANDLE_DIVREM_OVERFLOW_ABORT;
       tt = builtin_decl_explicit (bcode);
+      op0 = unshare_expr (op0);
+      op1 = unshare_expr (op1);
       tt = build_call_expr_loc (loc, tt, 3, data, ubsan_encode_value (op0),
                                ubsan_encode_value (op1));
     }
@@ -152,7 +154,7 @@ ubsan_instrument_shift (location_t loc, enum tree_code code,
       && flag_isoc99)
     {
       tree x = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, op1_utype, uprecm1,
-                           fold_convert (op1_utype, op1));
+                           fold_convert (op1_utype, unshare_expr (op1)));
       tt = fold_convert_loc (loc, unsigned_type_for (type0), op0);
       tt = fold_build2 (RSHIFT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (tt), tt, x);
       tt = fold_build2 (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node, tt,
@@ -167,12 +169,13 @@ ubsan_instrument_shift (location_t loc, enum tree_code 
code,
       && (cxx_dialect >= cxx11))
     {
       tree x = fold_build2 (MINUS_EXPR, op1_utype, uprecm1,
-                           fold_convert (op1_utype, op1));
-      tt = fold_convert_loc (loc, unsigned_type_for (type0), op0);
+                           fold_convert (op1_utype, unshare_expr (op1)));
+      tt = fold_convert_loc (loc, unsigned_type_for (type0),
+                            unshare_expr (op0));
       tt = fold_build2 (RSHIFT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (tt), tt, x);
       tt = fold_build2 (GT_EXPR, boolean_type_node, tt,
                        build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (tt), 1));
-      x = fold_build2 (LT_EXPR, boolean_type_node, op0,
+      x = fold_build2 (LT_EXPR, boolean_type_node, unshare_expr (op0),
                       build_int_cst (type0, 0));
       tt = fold_build2 (TRUTH_OR_EXPR, boolean_type_node, x, tt);
     }
@@ -197,7 +200,7 @@ ubsan_instrument_shift (location_t loc, enum tree_code code,
          TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (op0) = 1;
        }
     }
-  t = fold_build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (t), op0, t);
+  t = fold_build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (t), unshare_expr (op0), t);
   t = fold_build2 (TRUTH_OR_EXPR, boolean_type_node, t,
                   tt ? tt : integer_zero_node);
 
@@ -216,6 +219,8 @@ ubsan_instrument_shift (location_t loc, enum tree_code code,
          ? BUILT_IN_UBSAN_HANDLE_SHIFT_OUT_OF_BOUNDS
          : BUILT_IN_UBSAN_HANDLE_SHIFT_OUT_OF_BOUNDS_ABORT;
       tt = builtin_decl_explicit (bcode);
+      op0 = unshare_expr (op0);
+      op1 = unshare_expr (op1);
       tt = build_call_expr_loc (loc, tt, 3, data, ubsan_encode_value (op0),
                                ubsan_encode_value (op1));
     }

        Marek

Reply via email to