On 07/11/2015 09:46 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to ping this one too: a tad less trivial than the other one
- a little explanation here or in a comment would definitely help -
but certainly it looks much simpler than my own tries a while ago...
Regression testing information is also missing.
... in fact, one could argue that most of difference between Andrea's
patch and my original try here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00821.html
is mostly a matter of style + TYPE_P vs the narrower identifier_p...
Paolo.
