On 7/11/2015 1:45 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 11 July 2015 at 06:46, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 07/10/2015 06:34 PM, John Marino wrote: >>> >>> After posting the first testsuite results for DragonFly, it was clear >>> that the -fcilkplus functionality was broken: >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-07/msg01046.html >>> >>> The problem was related to the __cpu_model symbol not getting exported. >>> >>> The solution was to create libgcc/config/i386/t-dragonfly to define an >>> additional symbol map (similar to t-freebsd). Simply creating the file >>> is enough because there's already a placeholder for t-dragonfly at >>> libgcc/config.host. The patch is attached. >>> >>> The improved results of the patch can be seen on the next posted >>> testsuite results: >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-07/msg01081.html >>> >>> An additional ~2600 tests now pass. >>> Please consider this patch for incorporation into trunk. Only DragonFly >>> uses the new t-dragonfly file so there is no impact to other platforms. >>> >>> suggested entry for libgcc/ChangeLog: >>> >>> 2015-07-XX John Marino <gnu...@marino.st> >>> >>> * config/i386/t-dragonfly: New. >> >> OK. >> jeff >> > > John, If you like I can commit this for you on Monday when I commit > your patch to os_defines.h. >
That is very kind, Jonathan! thanks, Monday would be great. John P.S. I have a 3rd simple one that you can commit on Monday as well if it gets approved (no reason it shouldn't): https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00897.html
