Fix a copy-and-paste error. Tested with "make check-jit"; jit.sum remains at 8494 passes.
Committed to trunk as r225559. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_block_end_with_switch-NULL-case.c: Fix comments. --- ...t-error-gcc_jit_block_end_with_switch-NULL-case.c | 20 ++++---------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_block_end_with_switch-NULL-case.c b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_block_end_with_switch-NULL-case.c index 07a9848..009ad66 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_block_end_with_switch-NULL-case.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-gcc_jit_block_end_with_switch-NULL-case.c @@ -6,25 +6,12 @@ #include "harness.h" +/* Try to create a switch statement with a NULL case, so that + we can verify that we get a sane error message. */ + void create_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, void *user_data) { - /* Let's try to inject the equivalent of: - int - test_switch (int x) - { - switch (x) - { - case x: - return 3; - - default: - return 10; - } - } - and verify that we get a sane error about the non-const - case. - */ gcc_jit_type *t_int = gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT); gcc_jit_type *return_type = t_int; @@ -44,6 +31,7 @@ create_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, void *user_data) gcc_jit_block *b_default = gcc_jit_function_new_block (func, "default"); + /* Erroneous NULL case. */ gcc_jit_case *cases[1] = { NULL }; -- 1.8.5.3