On 07/22/2011 01:57 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 07/22/2011 01:33 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:09, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> I should mention here that I suspect the Cleanest solution is >>> to make DF_DEFER_INSN_RESCAN imply that we also shouldn't grab >>> data from the blocks those new insns are in either. In this >>> way one can create the block, link it up properly, and have >>> everything Just Work later, when deferred insns are processed. >> >> Yes, this also seems like the right approach. I'll try to find some >> time. I guess with this in place the rest of the patch should also >> Just Work? :) > > I should think so, with [trivial crash now fixed]...
Does anyone object to me committing the patch as-is, with the understanding that either Paulo or myself will, before too long, clean up the DF interface as described above? This is the only thing standing in the way of the dwarf2 cfi work being committed, which is in turn blocking Bernd's shrink-wrap work. r~
