This patch improves the X - (X / Y) * Y simplification a bit; with
using convert[12]? we're also able to fold INTEGER_CSTs with different
types.

Except using convert[12]? I also had to convert both operands of the
resulting expression to keep the gimple verifier happy.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, applying to trunk.

2015-06-30  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>

        * match.pd (X - (X / Y) * Y): Use convert1 and convert2.  Convert
        both operands of the resulting expression.      

        * gcc.dg/fold-minus-6.c: New test.

diff --git gcc/match.pd gcc/match.pd
index 682784b..e6728f4 100644
--- gcc/match.pd
+++ gcc/match.pd
@@ -240,9 +240,9 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
 
 /* X - (X / Y) * Y is the same as X % Y.  */
 (simplify
- (minus (convert? @0) (convert? (mult (trunc_div @0 @1) @1)))
+ (minus (convert1? @0) (convert2? (mult (trunc_div @0 @1) @1)))
  (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || VECTOR_INTEGER_TYPE_P (type))
-  (convert (trunc_mod @0 @1))))
+  (trunc_mod (convert @0) (convert @1))))
 
 /* Optimize TRUNC_MOD_EXPR by a power of two into a BIT_AND_EXPR,
    i.e. "X % C" into "X & (C - 1)", if X and C are positive.
diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-6.c 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-6.c
index e69de29..1c22c25 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-6.c
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-minus-6.c
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-cddce1" } */
+
+int
+fn1 (int x)
+{
+  return 42L - (42 / x) * x;
+}
+
+long
+fn2 (int x)
+{
+  return 42L - (42 / x) * x;
+}
+
+int
+fn3 (long int x)
+{
+  return 42L - (42 / x) * x;
+}
+
+int
+fn4 (int a, int b)
+{
+  return a - (unsigned) ((a / b) * b);
+}
+
+int
+fn5 (int a, unsigned int b)
+{
+  return a - ((a / b) * b);
+}
+
+unsigned int
+fn6 (int a, int b)
+{
+  return a - ((a / b) * b);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " / " "cddce1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " - " "cddce1" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " \\+ " "cddce1" } } */

        Marek

Reply via email to