On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 09:36:59AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > Anything wrong with this?
> > > 
> > > +/* X - (X / Y) * Y is the same as X % Y.  */
> > > +(simplify
> > > + (minus (convert? @0) (convert? (mult (trunc_div @0 @1) @1)))
> > > + (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || VECTOR_INTEGER_TYPE_P (type))
> > > +  (convert (trunc_mod @0 @1))))
>  
> That looks awfully similar to a variant I also tried (but I remember
> having convert1? and convert2? in it).  Not sure what was wrong with
> that one; certainly yours seems to work fine.
> 
> Not sure whether we need some tree_nop_conversion_p in it.  Perhaps not.
> 
> > Yes.  Eventually even (convert? (mult (convert1? (trunc_div ...)?
> > Of course with matching @0 between the two operands of the minus
> > you constrain types quite a bit.
> 
> I'm starting to dislike this whole convert business ;).

;)  fold-const.c STRIP_NOPS certainly was both convenient and
error-prone at the same time.

> > I'd say just single-step through fold and see what types it get
> > present when folding a - (unsigned) ((a / b) * b).
> 
> I did that.  The whole expression has type "unsigned int", arg0
> is "a" of type int and arg1 is "(a / b) * b" of type int.
> 
> The following version is what Marc suggests.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?

Ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

> 2015-06-29  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>
>           Marc Glisse  <marc.gli...@inria.fr>
> 
>       * fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc): Move X - (X / Y) * Y -> X % Y to ...
>       * match.pd: ... pattern here.
> 
> diff --git gcc/fold-const.c gcc/fold-const.c
> index 6f12dd0..01e3983 100644
> --- gcc/fold-const.c
> +++ gcc/fold-const.c
> @@ -10509,19 +10509,6 @@ fold_binary_loc (location_t loc,
>                           fold_convert_loc (loc, type,
>                                             TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0)));
>  
> -      /* X - (X / Y) * Y is X % Y.  */
> -      if ((INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || VECTOR_INTEGER_TYPE_P (type))
> -       && TREE_CODE (arg1) == MULT_EXPR
> -       && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 0)) == TRUNC_DIV_EXPR
> -       && operand_equal_p (arg0,
> -                           TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 0), 0), 0)
> -       && operand_equal_p (TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 0), 1),
> -                           TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 1), 0))
> -     return
> -       fold_convert_loc (loc, type,
> -                         fold_build2_loc (loc, TRUNC_MOD_EXPR, TREE_TYPE 
> (arg0),
> -                                      arg0, TREE_OPERAND (arg1, 1)));
> -
>        if (! FLOAT_TYPE_P (type))
>       {
>         /* Fold A - (A & B) into ~B & A.  */
> diff --git gcc/match.pd gcc/match.pd
> index b2f8429..2bc158b 100644
> --- gcc/match.pd
> +++ gcc/match.pd
> @@ -238,6 +238,12 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>        && tree_nop_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE (@1)))
>    (trunc_mod @0 (convert @1))))
>  
> +/* X - (X / Y) * Y is the same as X % Y.  */
> +(simplify
> + (minus (convert? @0) (convert? (mult (trunc_div @0 @1) @1)))
> + (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) || VECTOR_INTEGER_TYPE_P (type))
> +  (convert (trunc_mod @0 @1))))
> +
>  /* Optimize TRUNC_MOD_EXPR by a power of two into a BIT_AND_EXPR,
>     i.e. "X % C" into "X & (C - 1)", if X and C are positive.
>     Also optimize A % (C << N)  where C is a power of 2,
> 
>       Marek
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham 
Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to