On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 04:53:22PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Do you plan to move forward with this patch? Is it waiting to be reviewed?
> People keep asking about exception support for tsan (I guess it is
> critical for a significant potion of C++ out there). I am trying to
> sketch support in llvm. And I am leaning towards an approach similar
> to yours, that is, add cleanup blocks in middle-end. I think it is
> more portable and reliable then interception of __personality/_Unwind
> routines.
It is already in GCC 5.1 and on the trunk too.
Jakub
