On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Rainer Orth
<r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> "H.J. Lu" <hjl.to...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>>> > I think the whole thing should be posted as one patch, with both the
>>>> > target-independent changes and the target-specific changes for all
>>>> > targets.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> That is what makes me concerned.  I have some simple target-specified
>>>> patches which weren't reviewed for years. What will happen if no one
>>>
>>> For any unreviewed patch, keep pinging weekly.
>>>
>>>> reviews some simple target-specified changes due to
>>>>
>>>> 1. Reviewers don't have access to those targets.
>>>> 2. Target maintainers aren't review them.
>>>> 3. There are no clear maintainers for those targets.
>>>
>>> I've already said in
>>> <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg00593.html> that, given
>>> target maintainers CC:ed, I might be inclined to approve the patch on the
>>> basis of allowing them a week to test their target changes.
>>>
>>
>> Here is the complete patch.  Tested on Linux/x86-64.  It is also
>> available on hjl/pie/master branch in git mirror.
>
> I just noticed that with --enable-default-pie, while crtbeginS.o is
> linked into the executable, crtend.o is used, while with an explicit
> -pie, crtendS.o is taken.  Shouldn't GNU_USER_TARGET_ENDFILE_SPEC have
> the same treatment as GNU_USER_TARGET_STARTFILE_SPEC already did?
>
>         * config/gnu-user.h (GNU_USER_TARGET_STARTFILE_SPEC): Use
>         PIE_SPEC and NO_PIE_SPEC if HAVE_LD_PIE is defined.
>

Here is a patch.  OK for trunk?

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.
From 50bebf531193c18efb0982ac119694aa9f650e44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.to...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 03:04:56 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Use PIE_SPEC/NO_PIE_SPEC for crtend.o/crtendS.o

We need to link with crtend.o and crtendS.o properly for GCC configured
to generate PIE by default.

	* config/gnu-user.h (GNU_USER_TARGET_ENDFILE_SPEC): Use
	PIE_SPEC and NO_PIE_SPEC if HAVE_LD_PIE is defined.
---
 gcc/config/gnu-user.h | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/config/gnu-user.h b/gcc/config/gnu-user.h
index 2fcb55d..5b3576b 100644
--- a/gcc/config/gnu-user.h
+++ b/gcc/config/gnu-user.h
@@ -67,11 +67,20 @@ see the files COPYING3 and COPYING.RUNTIME respectively.  If not, see
    object constructed before entering `main', followed by a normal
    GNU userspace "finalizer" file, `crtn.o'.  */
 
+#if defined HAVE_LD_PIE
+#define GNU_USER_TARGET_ENDFILE_SPEC \
+  "%{fvtable-verify=none:%s; \
+     fvtable-verify=preinit:vtv_end_preinit.o%s; \
+     fvtable-verify=std:vtv_end.o%s} \
+   %{shared:crtendS.o%s;: %{" PIE_SPEC ":crtendS.o%s} \
+   %{" NO_PIE_SPEC ":crtend.o%s}} crtn.o%s"
+#else
 #define GNU_USER_TARGET_ENDFILE_SPEC \
   "%{fvtable-verify=none:%s; \
      fvtable-verify=preinit:vtv_end_preinit.o%s; \
      fvtable-verify=std:vtv_end.o%s} \
    %{shared|pie:crtendS.o%s;:crtend.o%s} crtn.o%s"
+#endif
 #undef  ENDFILE_SPEC
 #define ENDFILE_SPEC GNU_USER_TARGET_ENDFILE_SPEC
 
-- 
2.1.0

Reply via email to