On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > component... as indicated by an analysis of what is usually needed. Does > that seem like a reasonable breakdown? what was the *real* intention of > target.h?
target.h is what needs to be included to use target hooks. In particular, it would be desirable to eliminate the tm.h include from target.h (required by hard-reg-set.h, at least, at present), so that once a file has been freed of uses of target macros (all converted to hooks) they can't accidentally creep back in. I don't know offhand the best way of eliminating tm.h dependence in the types of hook arguments, but at least it would be best to *avoid* any designs that make it harder to remove that tm.h include. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
