On Mon, 8 Jun 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > > > I think we should instead work towards eliminating the get_alias_set > > langhook first. The LTO langhook variant contains the same handling, btw, > > so just inline that into get_alias_set and see what remains? > > I see, i completely missed existence of gimple_get_alias_set. It makes more > sense now. > > Is moving everyting to alias.c realy a desirable thing? If non-C languages do > not have this rule, why we want to reduce the code quality when compiling > those?
Well, for consistency and for getting rid of one langhook ;) Richard. > Honza > > > > Richard. > > > > > Honza > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Joseph S. Myers > > > > jos...@codesourcery.com > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> > > SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, > > Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg) > > -- Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Dilip Upmanyu, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)
