> On Tue, 26 May 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > > > On May 25, 2015 1:49:45 AM GMT+02:00, Jan Hubicka <hubi...@ucw.cz> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >2 Each enumerated type shall be compatible with char , a signed > > > >integer > > > > type, or an unsigned integer type. The choice of type is > > > >implementation-defined, but shall be capable of representing the > > > >values > > > > of all the members of the enumeration. The enumerated type is > > > > incomplete until immediately after the that terminates the list of > > > > enumerator declarations, and complete thereafter. > > > > > > > >(we ignore this completely as far as I know, it is easy to fix though, > > > >all > > > > we need is to make ENUMERATION_TYPE pretend to be INTEGER_TYPE) > > > > > > Don't forget -fshort-enum though. > > > > I believe -fshort-enum is makes us non-complian to the C standard and thus > > we are free to not follow this rule :) > > -fshort-enums is perfectly compatible with the C standard. The choice of > integer type depends on the enumerated type in question - different > enumerated types can be compatible with different integer types.
I see, so it does not need to be actual "int"/"unsigned int". I suppose we are then safe to just treat ENUMERATION_TYPE as INTEGER_TYPE. Thank you for clarification! Honza > > -- > Joseph S. Myers > jos...@codesourcery.com
