Hi Thomas, thanks for the review. Commited as r223738 with the changes (new testcase, double space in dg-do).
Regards, Andre On Wed, 27 May 2015 08:38:07 +0200 Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de> wrote: > Hi Andre, > > > Because this patch is obvious I plan to commit it tomorrow if no one > > objects?! > > The patch itself is obviously OK. > > About the test case: In general, it is better not to change existing > test cases unless absolutely necessary (e.g. adjust an error message). > This makes it easier to track regressions. > > I would prefer if you made a new test case from your existing one, > with the changes you did and a small explanation of what was > tested in the comments. > > If you are worried about runtime for an additonal test, you can use the > > ! { dg-do run } > > hack (notice the two spaces between the dg-do and the run) to have the > test case execute only once. > > OK with that change. > > Regards > > Thomas > -- Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de