I've committed this obvious patch for 65954. We failed to issue a diagnostic
for a failed class enum lookup, and returned NULL, rather than error_mark_node,
leading to a seg fault.
booted & tested on x86_64-linux.
nathan
2015-05-19 Nathan sidwell <nat...@acm.org>
cp/
PR c++/65954
* typeck.c (finish_class_member_access_expr): Diagnose failed
lookup of enum class member.
testsuite/
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr65954.C: New.
Index: cp/typeck.c
===================================================================
--- cp/typeck.c (revision 223414)
+++ cp/typeck.c (working copy)
@@ -2731,6 +2731,14 @@ finish_class_member_access_expr (tree ob
return error_mark_node;
}
tree val = lookup_enumerator (scope, name);
+ if (!val)
+ {
+ if (complain & tf_error)
+ error ("%qD is not a member of %qD",
+ name, scope);
+ return error_mark_node;
+ }
+
if (TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (object))
val = build2 (COMPOUND_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (val), object, val);
return val;
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr65954.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr65954.C (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr65954.C (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct Shape {
+ enum class Type
+ { Circle, Square };
+};
+
+
+void Foo (Shape &shape)
+{
+ +shape.Type::NOPE; // { dg-error "is not a member of" }
+}