On 05/18/2015 12:13 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This patch adds a REG_NREGS macro that by the end of the series
will simply be an rtx field access. The definition in this patch
is just a placeholder (and so I haven't tried to avoid the double
evaluation of the parameter).
The diff has extra context because in most cases it makes it obvious
that we really are looking at hard_regno_nregs[REGNO (x)][GET_MODE (x)]
for some rtx x. There are a couple of sites where it's more indirect
though.
gcc/
* rtl.h (REG_NREGS): New macro
* alias.c (record_set): Use it.
* cfgcleanup.c (mark_effect): Likewise.
* combine.c (likely_spilled_retval_1): Likewise.
(likely_spilled_retval_p, can_change_dest_mode): Likewise.
(move_deaths, distribute_notes): Likewise.
* cselib.c (cselib_record_set): Likewise.
* df-problems.c (df_simulate_one_insn_forwards): Likewise.
* df-scan.c (df_mark_reg): Likewise.
* dse.c (look_for_hardregs): Likewise.
* dwarf2out.c (reg_loc_descriptor): Likewise.
(multiple_reg_loc_descriptor): Likewise.
* expr.c (write_complex_part, read_complex_part): Likewise.
(emit_move_complex): Likewise.
* haifa-sched.c (setup_ref_regs): Likewise.
* ira-lives.c (mark_hard_reg_live): Likewise.
* lra.c (lra_set_insn_recog_data): Likewise.
* mode-switching.c (create_pre_exit): Likewise.
* postreload.c (reload_combine_recognize_const_pattern): Likewise.
(reload_combine_recognize_pattern): Likewise.
(reload_combine_note_use, move2add_record_mode): Likewise.
(reload_cse_move2add): Likewise.
* reg-stack.c (subst_stack_regs_pat): Likewise.
* regcprop.c (kill_value, copy_value): Likewise.
(copyprop_hardreg_forward_1): Likewise.
* regrename.c (verify_reg_in_set, scan_rtx_reg): Likewise.
(build_def_use): Likewise.
* sched-deps.c (mark_insn_reg_birth, mark_reg_death): Likewise.
(deps_analyze_insn): Likewise.
* sched-rgn.c (check_live_1, update_live_1): Likewise.
* sel-sched.c (count_occurrences_equiv): Likewise.
* valtrack.c (dead_debug_insert_temp): Likewise.
OK.
Makes me wonder if we want to poison hard_regno_nregs in some way to
avoid folks re-introducing this stuff in the future... Your call if you
want to tackle that as a follow-up.
jeff
