On 29 April 2015 at 11:00, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I noticed that gimple-walk.c has a creative list of #includes.
>> Furthermore, in walk_gimple_asm parse_{in,out}put_constraint was called
>> even if neither allows_mem, allows_reg nor is_inout were used -- i.e. if
>> wi is NULL -- and the return value of the constraint parsing was not
>> taken into account which looks wrong or at least odd. Note that several
>> other spots in the tree do ignore the parse_{in,out}put_constraint return
>> values and should be adjusted too AFAIU. Otherwise we might attempt
>> (and use!) to extract information from otherwise illegal constraints,
>> it seems?
>>
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux with no regressions.
>> Ok for trunk?
>
> Ok.r222569. Thanks!
